It's interesting that this week mentalist Marshall McLuhan's reading The Spoken Word: Flower of Evil? " really challenged me to think about the distinction between spoken words versus written words. McLuhan argues that spoken word is much more powerful in allowing response, engagement and understanding over written words. Where words don't give back a reaction or it can fall flat and not produce more than one meaning. Now for some people they read a book and it can be one of the great books of their lives because the words speak to them in a way, not another book can. Whereas, some people can watch a theatre play adapted from a famous play, and the spoken words are much more understanding and distinct than the writing itself. That great example can even be with Shakespeare. Or even reading Oedipus Rex, words that may seem flat on paper. I feel that there's an equal correlation with reaction/ response between spoken words and w...
oh you know, a blog about ideas that just come to mind and where I say stuff about it.